After writing 3 articles about ILP, Endowment Plan and Whole
Life Insurance in one day, it seems like many people are still confused about the
three products. Hence, I shall draw summaries and key takeaways for these 3 products.
Investment-Linked Plan (ILP)
------------------------------------------
Whole Life Insurance
-------------------------------
Investment-Linked Plan performance is purely based on your
selected funds. You can buy Singapore Growth fund, Asia Growth fund etc. You
can also split your monthly payment, 50% into Emerging Country fund or 50% into China
fund. So, your fund performance is solely depends on the funds you have picked. The
projected 5%, 9% returns of course are non guaranteed portion. That is just an
illustration if your fund yields a 5% return or 9% return. That is why there WILL NOT be any guarantee portion. How can an insurance
company guarantees such guarantee returns regardless of the funds you have chosen? It does
not make sense.
Endowment Plan
------------------------
As for Endowment Plan, there is no fund for you to choose from. You just buy and wait for the performance of the investment of the insurance company. Of course,
they also take your monies and invest but you have no control, they have. Therefore, they do have guarantee portion for Endowment plan and as well as non guarantee
portion. Usually, with endowment plan, the insurance company tends to be more
conservative in investing because they need to make sure they are able to pay
the guarantee portion. They will not bet your monies into high risk products or buying volatile stock like Genting share.
Usually, people are buying Endowment plan for the purpose of
discipline saving for certain purpose, for example, kid education fund, or even
save money to have a certain lump sum pay out at certain age. This is the lowest
insurance coverage plan, people will not buy Endowment plan for the
insurance coverage as their objective.
As for whole life insurance, I do not understand why people
are extremely sceptical about the performance of Tokio Marine by hitting the
projected bonuses every single time. Well, maybe it just sounds too good to be true.
There are some voices saying, if that is true, why they have this non-guarantee
portion too. Well, we are in Singapore ,
every single product is regulated in the same manner/format. I would believe this is
the regulation of MAS , I don’t know. This is the norm for every single insurance company to declare in
such format, guarantee and non guarantee. Please don't ask me why, ask PAP. If you check
carefully, Tokio Marine seems to give conservative non guarantee pay out compared to the rest of the insurance companies, simply
because, I believe, they want to achieve that non guarantee pay out every single year as their trademark of the product. So they can’t
just put a handsome number and then not hitting the mark at the end, just like many
other insurances companies. Well, even for the marketing material advertised at the Straits Times, it has
to be a true fact. If you doubt that, you can always check the figures yourself
or even ask any insurance agents, they are all trained and they know all the truth
and figures. Just ask a simple question, why the other insurance companies don't advertise in that manner? The answer is simple. They didn't meet the projected bonuses every single year. If they did, you think they don't want to advertise that too? Of course, other insurance companies will tell you the list of pros and cons for every single companies. Anyway, for whole life insurance, there is no funds for you to choose too.
Insurance companies will take your monies and invest somewhere as well. They
cannot place your monies in the bank and give you guarantee and non guarantee
pay out, right? It is common sense that all insurance plans required certain type of investment to
generate incomes.
Besides these 3 insurance products, there are other insurance plan
namely, term insurance, hospitalization & Surgical insurance(H&S) and travel insurance. They are all
the same “categories”.
Continue to pay money and no surrender value, zero value.
You just
keep paying for the insurance coverage. That’s it. We all know many people prefer term
insurance, because the premium is cheap or much cheaper than whole life insurance and the coverage is much bigger.
They will tell you the cost differences and the extra monies can be handled by themselves to do investment and generate better returns. That is one way of course. I do other investment myself too but I don’t
like term insurance simply because I do NOT like the idea of ZERO value.